Thread
What did the first farmers actually farm? Eight 'founder crops'—emmer wheat, einkorn wheat, barley, lentil, pea, chickpea, bitter vetch, and flax—have long been thought to have been the bedrock of Neolithic economies. But... 🧵
Early prehistoric sites in Southwest Asia keep turning up more 'exotic' (to us) species, like the sedge tubers mixed into the earliest known breads (doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1801071115) or the 'new glume wheat' (doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2020.105258), an important ancient crop that's now extinct.
Is it a coincidence that the founder crops are all species that remains staples today? In our new paper, @ArranzOtaeguiA and I examine what plants actually turn up the most in the remains of the earliest agricultural societies: doi.org/10.1007/s00334-023-00917-1
We gathered data on 144 million botanical remains from 135 prehistoric sites across Southwest Asia. Our analysis included the Neolithic (c. 9700 to 4500 BCE) and the periods immediately before and after – a total of 10,000 years of plant exploitation.
We found that Neolithic economies were much more diverse than previously thought. Free-threshing wheat, grass pea, faba bean, and new glume wheat were especially widely cultivated, but it included dozens of species of cereals, pseudocereals, legumes, brassicas, sedges, and more.
It turns out that the 'founder crops' weren't particularly special at all: rarely cultivated for the first thousand years of the Neolithic, they were never ubiquitous, weren't the first species to be domesticated, or the first or only to be spread outside of Southwest Asia.
The founder crops did become more common over the course of the Neolithic but, remarkably, we found this could be explained almost entirely by a steadily increasing reliance on wheat as a staple crop. There's a story waiting to be told there, I'm sure!
For us, it no longer makes sense to talk about crop packages. Neolithic farmers cultivated, managed and experimented a huge diversity of plants. Tracing the *individual* trajectories of these crops in the accumulated archaeobotanical remains reveals many fascinating new stories.
For more details, see our new open access paper in Vegetation History & Archaeobotany: doi.org/10.1007/s00334-023-00917-1.
And, of course, all the data and #Rstats code supporting the analysis is available on GitHub and Zenodo: github.com/joeroe/SWAsiaNeolithicFounderCrops.
Mentions
See All
Nicholas A. Christakis @NicholasAChristakis
·
Apr 13, 2023
Fantastic thread and work in computational archeology analyzing 144M botanical remains from 135 prehistoric sites in Southwest Asia during Neolithic (c. 9700 to 4500 BCE) and the adjoining periods reveals far broader plant exploitation and domestication than previously thought.