Shop American Girl Virtual Showroom

These promotions will be applied to this item:

Some promotions may be combined; others are not eligible to be combined with other offers. For details, please see the Terms & Conditions associated with these promotions.

eBook features:
  • Highlight, take notes, and search in the book
You've subscribed to ! We will preorder your items within 24 hours of when they become available. When new books are released, we'll charge your default payment method for the lowest price available during the pre-order period.
Update your device or payment method, cancel individual pre-orders or your subscription at
Your Memberships & Subscriptions
Kindle app logo image

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.

Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.

Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.

QR code to download the Kindle App

Follow the author

Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.

The Copernican Revolution: Planetary Astronomy in the Development of Western Thought Kindle Edition

4.6 4.6 out of 5 stars 72 ratings

For scientist and layman alike this book provides vivid evidence that the Copernican Revolution has by no means lost its significance today. Few episodes in the development of scientific theory show so clearly how the solution to a highly technical problem can alter our basic thought processes and attitudes. Understanding the processes which underlay the Revolution gives us a perspective, in this scientific age, from which to evaluate our own beliefs more intelligently. With a constant keen awareness of the inseparable mixture of its technical, philosophical, and humanistic elements, Thomas S. Kuhn displays the full scope of the Copernican Revolution as simultaneously an episode in the internal development of astronomy, a critical turning point in the evolution of scientific thought, and a crisis in Western man’s concept of his relation to the universe and to God.

The book begins with a description of the first scientific cosmology developed by the Greeks. Mr. Kuhn thus prepares the way for a continuing analysis of the relation between theory and observation and belief. He describes the many functions—astronomical, scientific, and nonscientific—of the Greek concept of the universe, concentrating especially on the religious implications. He then treats the intellectual, social, and economic developments which nurtured Copernicus’ break with traditional astronomy. Although many of these developments, including scholastic criticism of Aristotle’s theory of motion and the Renaissance revival of Neoplatonism, lie entirely outside of astronomy, they increased the flexibility of the astronomer’s imagination. That new flexibility is apparent in the work of Copernicus, whose
De Revolutionibus Orbium Coelestium (On the Revolutions of the Heavenly Spheres) is discussed in detail both for its own significance and as a representative scientific innovation.

With a final analysis of Copernicus’ life work—its reception and its contribution to a new scientific concept of the universe—Mr. Kuhn illuminates both the researches that finally made the heliocentric arrangement work, and the achievements in physics and metaphysics that made the planetary earth an integral part of Newtonian science. These are the developments that once again provided man with a coherent and self-consistent conception of the universe and of his own place in it.

This is a book for any reader interested in the evolution of ideas and, in particular, in the curious interplay of hypothesis and experiment which is the essence of modern science. Says James Bryant Conant in his Foreword: “Professor Kuhn’s handling of the subject merits attention, for…he points the way to the road which must be followed if science is to be assimilated into the culture of our times.”

Editorial Reviews

Review

“An illuminating account of the intellectual transformation which laid the foundations of modern science and philosophy, and which may therefore be said to have created the modern world.”Scientific American

“No other book is so patient, so comprehensive, so sensitive, in its recovery of the experience and the outlook from which the older scientific theories emerged. No other book so enables us to see the intellectual hurdles that existed and to relive something of the process of actual scientific discovery.”
American Historical Review

“In this study of the Copernican Revolution, [Thomas Kuhn] brings to a common focus the considered approach of the historian, the technical understanding of the scientist and the skill and experience of an able teacher. No careful reader of this well-wrought volume can fail to appreciate the nicely balanced interplay of these elements in the full explication of one of the major turning points in the evolution of scientific thought. For those concerned with the teaching of the history of science, Dr. Kuhn’s discussion of the issues involved in the Copernican Revolution will prove to be indispensable, a superb analysis of the ‘anatomy of revolution.’ Those drawn to the question of meaning which the historian of science can give to the evolution of ideas will find this book equally valuable, a paradigm of synthesis and interpretation.”
Isis

“Reading this book in the current age of extrasolar planets, genetics and string theory is eye-opening.”
Caleb Scharf, Nature

From the Back Cover

In this study of the Copernican Revolution, the author brings to a common focus the considered approach of the historian, the technical understanding of the scientist and the skill and experience of an able teacher.

Product details

  • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B097YMJMGL
  • Publisher ‏ : ‎ Harvard University Press (January 1, 1992)
  • Publication date ‏ : ‎ January 1, 1992
  • Language ‏ : ‎ English
  • File size ‏ : ‎ 1637 KB
  • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
  • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
  • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
  • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
  • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
  • Print length ‏ : ‎ 249 pages
  • Customer Reviews:
    4.6 4.6 out of 5 stars 72 ratings

About the author

Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations.
Thomas S. Kuhn
Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.
Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.

Thomas Kuhn (1922-1996)was professor emeritus of philosophy at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. His many books include The Structure of Scientific Revolutions and Black-Body Theory and the Quantum Discontinuity, 1894-1912, both published by the University of Chicago Press.

Customer reviews

4.6 out of 5 stars
72 global ratings

Review this product

Share your thoughts with other customers

Customers say

Customers find the book engaging and well-researched. They appreciate its insights and technical details about systems that impacted the revolution. The book provides a clear development of ideas and is intellectually challenging.

AI-generated from the text of customer reviews

Select to learn more
7 customers mention "Readability"7 positive0 negative

Customers find the book engaging and a useful resource. They describe it as satisfying and intellectually challenging.

"...It is a fascinating read." Read more

"...or interested in the history of the period, this would make fascinating reading. Well researched and well written. Highly recommended." Read more

"Really interesting read...." Read more

"Book is great. Fills in so much that you will never learn in school unless taking some specialized course...." Read more

6 customers mention "Insights"6 positive0 negative

Customers appreciate the book's insights. They find it well-researched and well-written, providing technical details about many systems that affect the revolution. The book provides a good review of astronomy prior to Copernicus and how astronomy then changed.

"This is a great review of astronomy prior to Copernicus and how astronomy then changed...." Read more

"...There are very many insights in it not found in the secondary literature. Read it, know it, and love it...." Read more

"...Well researched and well written. Highly recommended." Read more

"...Overall, the book develops the idea very clearly and gives insights that give a good understanding of how scientific thought developed." Read more

Top reviews from the United States

  • Reviewed in the United States on February 24, 2012
    This is a great review of astronomy prior to Copernicus and how astronomy then changed. The old Aristotle/Ptolemaic constructions were much more thoughtful than I had learned in secondary school and their predictive power was much better too. So in both a qualitative and quantitative way these theories were hard to dispute even with Copernicus' new sun centered universe, which did not do any better quantitatively. Gradually, as the telescope came into existence (Galileo) so that the observational data pushed the astronomers away from the circles and epicycles to the ellipses, did astronomy advance to predictions quantitatively better. This book shows how that all came to be and how it affected the world outside astronomy. It shows how the old cosmology had come to be adopted as a world view in religion and why they clung to it so. Anyone reading this book will gain a greater respect for what the ancients accomplished and how brilliant they were in building the cosmology that was replaced by Copernicus, Brahe, Kepler, Galileo, and Newton. It also showed how these built on others who are not so well known. It is a fascinating read.
    9 people found this helpful
    Report
  • Reviewed in the United States on November 18, 2014
    A Flawed Masterpiece
    This masterpiece was a 1956 case study for Thomas Kuhn. It was on a road that led him to his magnificent theory of scientific revolutions in 1962. All the important conceptions are here, anomaly, crisis, scientific community, and paradigm.
    The fatal flaw is in Kuhn’s claim about the nature of the crisis faced by the scientific community in the Renaissance. Crisis is an important conception for Kuhn. It meant that scientists could no longer accept the errors between observed locations of the planets and the predictions made by Ptolemy’s theory. For example, the Viennese astronomers Regiomontanus and Peurbach observed an error of 2 degrees for Mars in 1458. They also found the predicted eclipse of the moon happened one hour later than predicted. They found these errors grotesque.
    Kuhn thinks the increasing complexity of the Ptolemaic system sapped its accuracy. This does not fit the facts. Owen Gingerich in “Crisis versus Aesthetic in the Copernican Revolution” tested the claim. The predictions used to test it were in printed tabular form called ephemerides issued by various astronomers. These were compared with the actual positions of the planet Mars. Mars is the most difficult planet to predict for the Ptolemaics. The time span was 1270 to 1585. The tables were virtually identical theoretically. The degree of error was also uniform between them. Complexity did not cause inaccuracy. The errors came from something else.
    Ptolemy was wrong; Earth did indeed move and was not the center of the universe. It was a premise of Copernicus’ theory that it revolved about the sun and spun on its axis. To predict the location of the planet Mars in the sky, one had to not only know its orbit, but the Earth’s as well. Kuhn claims that this led to no improvement in predicting the planets’ locations in space and time. See page 169 of his text. This is curious, since it mathematically increases the quantitative power of the planetary theory. Was Kuhn correct or not?
    Gingerich’s article shows error data for Ptolemaic and Copernican ephemerides. The data sets are in powerful graphical form. They overlap one another in time for comparability. I found the Ptolemaics had a very similar variance in error of about 2.15 with a characteristic lobate error pattern. The Copernicans had a much lower variance of about 0.90 with an interesting dentate pattern. The range of error was much lower for them, too.
    Clearly, the astronomers of the Renaissance read Copernicus’ innovative textbook, found that it led to dramatically better results in prediction and adopted it, whether they agreed with its premises or not. One of its early readers was Michael Maestlin. Astronomy at that time was a required course for undergraduates. Tellingly, he used Ptolemaic theory for those classes. He used Copernicus’ text for the graduate program. History knows him as the mentor to Kepler. Their letters are precious.
    Finally, Kuhn is mistaken about the complexity of the mathematics of Copernicus. I can tell you it is no more difficult than a class in second year algebra and I encourage all to read it. There are very many insights in it not found in the secondary literature. Read it, know it, and love it. A full English translation by A. M. Duncan is available and recommended.
    Charles Pierce Wikman
    13 people found this helpful
    Report
  • Reviewed in the United States on March 2, 2011
    It is a pity that the Amazon rating system is limited to only 5-stars. This book is, in my opinion, worth many more. I must admit that I hesitated getting this book for many years as I was misled by the sub-title "Planetary Astronomy in the Development of Western Thought". I believed this to be a thick and imponderable philosophical tome - it is not. The book is clearly written, and does not require that the reader have a mathematical, philosophical or astronomical background. The book describes the paradigm shift from an earth-centered universe to a sun-centered one. It thus begins with the astronomical beliefs of the ancient Greeks and shows the evolution of astronomy from this to that of Copernicus and then to Newton's explanation using his equations of gravity.

    I learned a lot from this book. For instance,
    1. I learned a bit about solar and celestial navigation.
    2. I never even realized that the seasons are of unequal length, now I do and I understand why.
    3. I now have a reasonable idea of the complexity of the Ptolemaic (earth-center) view of the cosmos and why it was believed for 2000 years. Kuhn does a great job of explaining and describing the essence of this very complex system.
    4. I now understand some of the influences that led Copernicus to believe that the Ptolemaic paradigm needed to be replaced. The reasons for this shift were many and complex, but are clearly stated.
    5. I always thought that the system developed by Copernicus was what we believe today, but now I realize that it was much more complex, but that while it was as complex as that of Ptolemy it was not more accurate in its predictions. I also see why some of the incorrect assumptions made by Copernicus led to this complexity and lack of accuracy.
    6. I clearly see why in spite of its complexity and lack of increased accuracy the Copernican paradigm gradually replaced the Ptolemaic paradigm, but not without overcoming a considerable amount of resistance.
    7. I understand the importance of the contributions of Tycho Brahe and Johannes Kepler to the ultimate dominance of the Copernican system.
    8. I learned how Johannes Kepler, Rene Descartes and Robert Hooke influenced the work of Isaac Newton and that Newton's laws of gravity were not a unique creation of his alone, although its complete mathematical formulation certainly was.

    These ideas in this book are presented in a very clear and very accessible manner. I now have to add this book to my short list of those that I think anyone who considers himself/herself well educated should be acquainted with.
    34 people found this helpful
    Report
  • Reviewed in the United States on July 19, 2017
    I thought this book was interesting, but a bit slow. It worked very well for class, though, and it came in great condition.
  • Reviewed in the United States on November 28, 2012
    From time to time I have given presentations on astronomical history topics. I found this book to be a fantastic resource. But for anyone interested in the history of thought regarding our concept of a solar system with the sun at the center, or interested in the history of the period, this would make fascinating reading. Well researched and well written. Highly recommended.
    One person found this helpful
    Report

Top reviews from other countries

Translate all reviews to English
  • Matmor
    4.0 out of 5 stars Ciencia y pensamiento
    Reviewed in Mexico on October 2, 2017
    Este es un libro apasionante, desde el inicio el propósito es expresado con claridad: mostrar como la ciencia desborda sus propias fronteras para influir y transformar el pensamiento y modificar, revolucionar, las concepciones y prejuicios de las demás disciplinas humanas. El ejemplo de la Revolución Copernicana es presentado de forma crítica y clsra
  • anthony r.
    5.0 out of 5 stars Five Stars
    Reviewed in the United Kingdom on May 29, 2018
    A hard and worthwhile read

Report an issue


Does this item contain inappropriate content?
Do you believe that this item violates a copyright?
Does this item contain quality or formatting issues?